Name *

First Name

Last Name

Annual total energy consumption (GWh) *

Please indicate your electricity and gas consumption. To convert gas consumption to GWh, please note the calorific value of your national statistics office, according to which 1 m3 of natural gas has an average value of Please indicate your electricity and gas consumption. To convert gas consumption to GWh, please note the calorific value of your national statistics office, according to which 1 m3 of natural gas has an average value of 37MJ or 9.44 kWh (source: Romanian National Institute of Statistics)

Below 0.5 GWh

0.5 GWh - 1 GWh

1 GWh - 2 GWh

2 GWh - 4 GWh

4 GWh - 10 GWh

10 GWh - 40 GWh

Above 40 GWh

1.1 Energy Efficiency appears as a factor for competitiveness and efficiency in the corporate strategy *

It does not appear in the strategy or there is no declared strategy

It has some parts of the strategy

It is an important element in the corporate strategy

It has been part of the enterprise strategy for several years and is updated every year

1.2 The organization has a certified energy management system in accordance with an international standard (e.g. EN 16001, ISO 50001) *

No steps have yet been taken to develop such a system

There is currently a management system under implementation

The organization has an international certificate

The management system has been operating for several years and has undergone renewed audits

1.3 In the corporate culture and driving practice, energy efficiency is not a unique cost reduction action but a commitment to continuous development *

There are only individual, not interlinked cost cutting actions

Energy efficiency appears as a series of actions to achieve the cost reduction goal

Improving energy efficiency is driven by the strategy

Energy efficiency is part of a commitment to continuous development

1.4 In the job description of a member of the top management, the powers and responsibility for managing energy efficiency have been declared *

There is no appointed person responsible for energy efficiency within the top management

A person has been appointed as responsible for managing energy efficiency, but this person is not a member of top management

A member of the top management is the designated person in charge of energy efficiency management

One member of the top management is dedicated to manage energy efficiency only

1.5 There is a designated energy manager in the organization whose recognition ("bonus"=motivation system) is tied to energy efficiency results *

There is no designated energy manager

There is an energy manager appointed

The motivation package is motivation is adjusted to the results

There is a designated energy manager in the organization whose recognition ("bonus") is tied to energy efficiency results, and this system has been successful for several years

1.6 Theres is a so-called Energy Efficiency Working Group consisting of internal or external experts, monitoring energy efficiency from all organizational aspects *

There is no designated Energy Efficiency Working Group

There is an Energy Efficiency Working Group, but it does not cover all affected entities of the organization or works in an ad hoc manner

There is an Energy Efficiency Working Group that represents all the relevant units of the organization and is regulated in the organizational description

The annual/seasonal formulated statement system has been successful for several years

1.7 At the annual personal performance evaluation of the members of the Energy Efficiency Working Group, the energy manager's assessment and the energy efficiency results achieved will be taken into account *

There is no designated workgroup or no annual performance evaluation

Members of the working group have annual performance evaluation but this is not linked to energy efficiency results

The members of the working group have an annual performance evaluation, the results of which depends on the energy efficiency results and the evaluation of the energy manager

The system stated in the above statement has been successful for several years

1.8 The energy manager can directly forward to top managers the obstacles to energy efficiency and receives their help to overcome these obstacles *

No designated energy manager

There is an energy manager, but its report travels through several levels to top management

There is an energy manager and the top management is a partner in immediate problem receipt and resolution

The organizational culture formulated in the above statement has been typical for many years

2.1 The company is able to measure energy consumption at each cost center (e.g. departments) *

There is no separate measurement at each cost center

Periodic measurements are performed at certain cost centers

Continuous measurements are made at the most relevant cost centers

For many years, continuous measurements have been carried out at almost every cost center

2.2 The measuring devices are regularly checked and maintained (e.g. energy meters) *

There are no measuring devices or no control system

The measuring devices are checked but are not regularly maintained

The measuring devices are regularly checked and maintained

The measuring devices are calibrated or verified on a regular basis in addition to inspection and maintenance

2.3 The company has an energy management system capable of processing and evaluating measured data *

No energy monitoring system

There is energy monitoring that collects data, automatically authenticates, but does not evaluate

The energy monitoring system evaluates the data (compares it with the target value and indicates if it is outside the required range and needs to intervene)

The energy management system has been the basis for short-term and long-term operational planning for several years

2.4 Is the energy management system data integrated into company management information system? *

Only occasional, manual reading and data recording are performed

Data is read manually, but the data is already automated

Data readout and data entry are done automatically, but connection to the management information system is ad hoc

Data readout and data entry are done automatically, integrated into the entire company management information system

2.5 Compared with the monthly report for management (as part of the general corporate report or as a separate energy report), the projected energy efficiency targets and current results are compared and predict the expected annual financial impact *

There are no energy efficiency elements in the monthly reports

Only current data and results are included in monthly reports

In monthly reports, there are predictions, along with current data and results

The management also receives more frequent data than the monthly report and has been running for several years

2.6 In addition to the monthly report, historical energy consumption and energy efficiency data can be accessed in a similar structure and timeline format *

Historical data is not available

Historical data may occasionally be collected manually

Historical data is available in a similar structure and timeline format

The system of monthly reports has been operating for several years by comparing past data with time series

2.7 The monthly energy efficiency report is available for all levels of the organization, adapting to the needs of the users

The monthly report is unavailable or the same report is used at each management level

Reports are manually compiled for different management levels

Management Level Reports are automatically generated by the management information system in predefined format and detail

The multi-level reporting system has been successful for several years, and metrics help to analyse data

2.8 Our company has simplified energy audit accomplished (energy bills, small investments from contracts, and uncompromised energy efficiency proposals) *

Not made

Made long ago (1 year+)

Made in the past 1 year

It is made once a year or more frequently

2.9 Our company has simplified energy audit accomplished (energy bills, small investments from contracts, and uncompromised energy efficiency proposals) *

Not made

It was made more than 3 years ago

Made in the last 3 years

It is done every year

2.10 The organization has the statutory building energy certificate *

It does not

It is currently in progress

It has for the establishments where it is compulsory

It has for all establishments

3.1 Objectives are based on baseline values and the potentials revealed *

No base value calculation

The goal is to maintain the set base value

The goal is to improve the base value to a certain extent

The target is tailored to the potential

3.2 The organization's objectives are to increase the share of renewable energy used *

There is no such objective and no renewable energy is used

It has already been targeted to use renewable energy

The organization uses renewable energy

The organization uses renewable energy and aims to further expand it

3.3 Goals for each cost center are broken down by involving the Energy Efficiency Working Group *

There is no such breakdown

Breakdown is performed for cost centers, but centrally, or not for all cost centers

All targets goes are sign to each post location by the working

For many years, it has been successful to break down the targets and evaluate them at cost centers

3.4 Energy Efficiency targets are designated by the Energy Performance Indicators (eg, kWh / m2 / person or other specific indicators) related to the activity of the given cost center *

No EPIs are selected

There are some EPIs selected, but not all cost centers or aligned with the activity

A system of activity-tailored EPIs has been fully developed

The energy indicator system has been operating successfully for many years

3.5 The objectives are in accordance with the "S.M.A.R.T." (specific, measurable, ambitious, realistic, time-bound) *

There are no set goals

The goals are only limitedly in line with the S.M.A.R.T. requirements

The objectives are in accordance with S.M.A.R.T. requirements

The objective definition system has been successful for many years

3.6 Energy efficiency objectives can not be changed between two review periods *

You can change the objective value at any time

With management approval, the target values can be changed

Only with top management approval, and reasonable justification can lead to the change of a target value

Accurate internal regulation defines goal-setting and monitoring considerations

3.7 Action plans for objective energy efficiency goals are adopted *

There are no action plans

Action plans are simple task and budget plans

Action plans include task, cost and schedule

The format and requirements of the action plans are set by internal regulation

3.8 In the ranking of the action plans calculation of ROI also base roll *

No return calculations are made

Only a simple return on investment is calculated

Internal rate of return and / or net present value are calculated

The action plans are also subject to sensitivity analysis and risk analysis

3.9 Target values are regularly reviewed (annually) by top management *

No regular review

They are updated only using the base values

They are updated after thorough evaluation and analysis

The yearly review system for target values has been working successfully for many years

3.10 Energy efficiency improvement action plans are regularly reviewed, evaluated and updated *

No regular review

There is an overview only on a case-by-case basis or in the case of the action plans

Regular review and evaluation is carried out

A regulation defines the process of reviewing and updating the action plans

3.11 The efficiency of the target system and the success of the implementation of the action plans are reviewed periodically at enterprise level *

There is no such organizational periodic review

There is only informal, general overview

The efficiency and results of the process are reviewed and developed at organizational level

The annual review system of the objective and development process has been successful for many years

4.1 The organization provides an adequate level of resources for the Energy Manager and Energy Efficiency Working Group *

There is no designated Energy Manager or no Work Group

The resources are sufficient for the Energy Manager and the Work Group to perform

The Energy Manager or the Working Group has a separate annual budgetary framework

The resources of the Energy Manager and the Working Group are defined for several years in advance

4.2 The organization plans and provides the resources needed to implement the projects included in the action plan *

There are no action plans or no specific resources assigned

Assets are provided with unique, adhoc decision-making

Resources for action plans appear in the annual business plan

The resource requirements for action plans are planned for several years ahead

4.3 The organization continuously develops itselfs and develops its human resources in line with energy efficiency targets *

There are no goals or no links to HR development goals

The organization's annual training plan shows energy efficiency targets on an ad hoc basis

There is a training and HR development module tailored for energy efficiency goals

For many years, the organization's HR development system successfully serves energy efficiency goals

4.4 The Energy Manager(s) of the organization receives continuous external professional training *

No

For more than 3 years, there was no such training

In the past 3 years, they were trained

At least once a year they receive training

4.5 The organization continuously motivates its employees, enhances their awareness of achieving energy efficiency goals *

There are no goals or no relationship to the motivation system

Energy-efficiency goals are in the organization's motivation system, but on an ad hoc basis

There is a motivational and awareness-raising system tailored to energy efficiency goals

The organization's motivational system has been successful in serving energy efficiency goals for many years

5.1 The organization demonstrates proven and quantified savings on a project basis and deposits them in the Virtual Power Plan Program (VPPP) *

It does not calculate and recognise its savings

Savings are identified but not deposited to and recognised in internal VPPP

The organization deposits its savings in the internal VPPP

The magnitude of the savings recorded in the internal VPPP is significant in relation to the organization's energy consumption

5.2 The organization quantifies all its expenditures and benefits of its energy efficiency development activity and reviews it annually *

It does not show the expense and benefits of the organization's energy efficiency activities

Efforts and benefits of energy efficiency development activities will be identified

Expenditure on activities is shown but there is no gain realized

It has been reviewing and analysing the expense and benefits of energy efficiency improvements for many years

5.3 The organization documents its energy efficiency development activities as "success reports" *

No improvements have been documented

There are documented "success stories", but only on a case-by-case basis

The improvements that have been made are regularly documented in the "Success Stories"

The "Success Stories" format is adapted to international practice

5.4 Sharing the results of the organization's energy efficiency improvement with its employees, suppliers, partners *

We do not shared with organisation members

The documented "success stories" are being shared, but only on a case-by-case basis

The organization shares its "Success Reports" with employees, suppliers and partners

The organization shares its experiences and good practice nationwide

5.5 Recognition of employees involved in energy efficiency development activities is presented to the entire organization *

There is no such recognition scheme or no presentation

Recognitions are presented on an occasional basis

Recognitions are presented throughout the organization

The organization shares its experiences and good practice with all of stakeholders

5.6 External recognition of the organization's energy efficiency improvements and performance *

There was no such recognition for the organisation

The organization has already taken steps to gain recognition

The organization has received some domestic recognition in terms of energy efficiency

The organization gained international recognition in terms of energy efficiency

5.7 Analysing the energy efficiency results of the organization by benchmarking and comparing national and international best practices *

There is no such analysis and comparison

Benchmarking analyses were carried out, but on an ad hoc and isolated basis

Regular benchmarking analyses are made

Comprehensive benchmarking analyses have been carried out for years

I got to know and accept the following documents: *

Documents can be viewed at the bottom of the page by clicking on the buttons!

Privacy and Data Management Policy

*

Commitment Rules

*

Declaration of authorization on using trademark and logo